Introduction:
I couldn’t read until I was in the second grade I think. That’s how old? Six? Seven? I might be over shooting it but I was not a kid who was reading at age 2 and solving math equations at 3. I wasn’t stupid, I was just a slow learner. That isn’t the case anymore, but I look back on my history with literature and find it somewhat unbelievable that once I didn’t like to or even couldn’t read. Because these days I love reading. I read every single day and have anywhere from 3-5 books on me wherever I go and am constantly acquiring new ones. The genesis of becoming someone to whom the consumption of literature is akin to breathing isn’t something that happened overnight though, it happened gradually over time, but it started somewhere deceptively simple: Comic Books.
I’d venture a guess that if it weren’t for Spider-Man, not only would I not be the geek I am today, but I also wouldn’t have developed a love for reading as mush as I have now. I am a visual learner in the sense that I can process and understand things I see faster than things I read. Because of this, comics and graphic novels were the perfect storytelling medium for me to latch onto as a kid. Today I read books of all shapes, sizes, subjects and mediums, but Graphic Novels continue to make up a sizable portion of my reading list. There are people who would try to argue that Graphic Novels and Comic Books are just kid stuff, but that argument went out the validity window in the 80’s with the publication of Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns. Compound those mainstream publications with underground comics guru Art Spiegelman’s biographical comic Maus, which was published just over a decade from 1980 to 1991, Graphic Novels have long since stopped being simply “funny pages.”
But those books are far from the only Comics worthy of your time and respect. I’ve been reading Comics for almost as long as I have been able to read and there are entire universes out there waiting to be explored, but are often overlooked because of any number of short-sighted reasons. So, of course, I have an agenda. That agenda is, as always, to talk about things: comics I think are good and would recommend, characters I like, obvious stuff like Rob Liefeld’s pact with Mephisto and why Mark Millar is a giant tool, why you should go see the upcoming Dark Knight Rises (even though the main villain is Bane). Also, the aforementioned problems with the Comic Book industry and why those problems are no better or worse than any other print or media industry, what’s out there besides the universally prevalent Superhero stories, and who my favorite writers are and why. If it is comic book, graphic novel or sequential art related, I will be talking about it here. Welcome, Thrill-Seekers to GRAPHIC CONTENT.
Actually, I will make one of these easy on you.
Why you should go see Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises Even Though The Main Villain Is The Almost Comical Bane.
As everyone with some kind of pop culture radar is aware, Christopher Nolan’s final chapter in his Batman trilogy, The Dark Knight Rises, hits theaters July 20th and I am, well, I’m stupidly excited. With The Avengers film just having come out recently and everyone and their mother telling me about how it is the greatest thing since Nutella was applied to sliced bread, it is going to be an interesting summer for Superhero films, especially considering that people are calling The Avengers possibly the greatest Superhero film ever made. I can’t speak to that, I haven’t seen it yet and frankly, I don’t give a rip about The Avengers themselves, considering I all but entirely gave up on Marvel back when the House Of M crossover occurred. And I don’t think Joss Whedon is the second coming of Christ (save the hate mail, he’s not bad. Just not my favorite). So I’ll get to it. Eventually. But a part of me is wondering if I should wait to see it until after TDKR comes out. That probably won’t be the case, but it does make me wonder if it would change my experience to see them in the opposite order, even though they are unrelated. But I’m off topic.
There are a myriad of factors that make The Dark Knight Rises an exciting proposition for me. Largely because it is the end of the story that started in Batman Begins and not just the next chapter, which implies that everything is on the line and not everybody is going to walk away from this one unscathed. I don’t know the entirety of the story of course, but I do know the minor details that have been revealed ahead of time and also seen the trailer. If nothing else it looks amazing. But there is one detail that seems to worry everyone I talk to, and that detail is Bane. Batman is more than just Superhero. He is cultural icon. Even people who don’t read comics know who he is, his story, who his major villains are and have seen his movies. While those of us who actually do read the comics and care about the character on a more personal level have a greater stake in this, everyone wants this movie to be good, even if they only care about the character on a superficial level. Hence the concern from many parties regarding Bane.
Bane is a villain with a difficult history within Batman lore and franchise. A tactical genius with superhuman strength derived from a fictional steroid called Venom, he is notable for being the villain to come closest to actually killing Batman, and did succeed in crippling him. Bane’s original and most famous appearance was during the early 90’s in a story called Knightfall in which Bane, having previously deduced Batman’s identity as Bruce Wayne, destroys Arkham Asylum and unleashes all of Batman’s major villains, forces him to deal with them all in rapid succession, and then steps in to take down Batman himself. In the final battle of the story arch, Bane broke Batman’s back and proceeded to take over Gotham’s criminal empires with no one to stop him. He was eventually defeated by Azreal, one of Batman’s protégés.
Batman has long since recovered and Bane has appeared in other stories, but since Knightfall he’s been plagued with troubles. And for good reason. Bane is a product of the early 90’s era of comics, when people were still trying to understand why and how Alan Moore’s Watchmen and Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns had affected the industry. Both of these stories were extremely innovative for different reason, but a common factor between them was that they were both substantially darker and “grittier” (a word that has plagued comics since), than previous Superhero tales had been. This was the element that the comics industry latched onto first, and for much of the early to mid 90’s it was assumed that stories, Superhero stories especially, had to be darker and more violent to be more compelling. Bane was an unforgiving and brutal Supervillain that was truly unlike any foe that Batman had previously faced, in that he possessed both strategic intellect and incredible strength. He was intended to be the perfect foe for Batman to face in a “darker,” “grittier” setting. And in that, he succeeded… Kind of. While I personally enjoy the majority of Knightfall, lots of people I have met really dislike the storyline and point to it as a low point in Batman’s history, not precisely because of the back-break, but because Bane seemed like such an absurd villain. Being of South American descent and wearing what many people initially read as a luchador mask, compounded with a gigantic, almost comically (ha) muscular physique, Bane is often regarded as one of the more ridiculous Supervillains from his era. The fact that he bears a similar color scheme to Todd McFarlane characters Venom and Spawn have led many to believe that he too is one of his early 90’s creations, further sullying his reputation.
Since The Dark Age Of Comics has ended, not many writers seem to know what to do with Bane. As previously mentioned, he has made appearances in a number of different stories, but having the stigma of being “the man who broke the bat” makes him a bit one-dimensional in the hands of many writers. This is a shame, considering that he is set up to be a more versatile character. His back story is fairly compelling, he is full of muscle but has the intelligence to know how to use it effectively, and he knows Batman’s identity, making him arguably more dangerous to Batman personally than even the Joker. But usually he’s just big angry muscle, and his played-for-laughs-to-the-point-of-stupidity appearance in the Batman And Robin movie hasn’t helped in the slightest. Actually, though I haven’t had the chance to read it yet, my understanding is that Gail Simone used him to great effect in her Secret Six comic, but part of that was her understanding of him as a slightly ludicrous character. So effective, but not menacing in the slightest.
Understanding all of this, it is easy to see why people have been a little bit concerned about him being the primary antagonist in The Dark Knight Rises. The character, in the wrong hands, is rife with problems and can be just too silly. I am going to state for the record that I am of the conviction that, in the case of TDKR, these fears of a lackluster villain will be totally unfounded. Here’s why: He is played by Tom Hardy.
This will not a comical take on Bane. This will not an over-the-top, grim and gritty, early 90’s luchador on steroids take either. This will be something entirely new, and he will be portrayed by Tom Hardy, who is, I will hazard, the perfect person to play him. It has come to my attention recently that Tom Hardy is one of those actors who is of near Daniel Day-Lewis level of acting skill: he can simply disappear into a role and become someone different. If you have never heard of a film called Bronson, I suggest you drop whatever you are doing and go watch it right now. It is one of the best movies I have seen all year and it features Tom Hardy as the titular character, the “most dangerous man in the british prison system.” The film is based on true events and it is a tour-de-force for everyone involved, but Tom Hardy is the star of the show and he delivers a enrapturing performance as a man who knows no way to communicate with the rest of the world except through violence. He does not look like himself. He looks terrifying.
If the TDKR’s trailers and Tom Hardy’s previous role in Bronson are any indication, Bane is going to be breaking people left, right and center. And like the real life Bronson, Bane is a character who best communicates through violence. But he is also supposed to be brilliant, cunning and dangerous even without lifting his fists. Unlike the Venom-enhanced Bane of the comics, the version presented in TDKR wears a mask that constantly pumps anesthetic into his system, numbing him to pain and making him all but unstoppable. He also comes off visually as something that he hasn’t ever truly been before: menacing. Considering the skill and care that Christopher Nolan applied to both Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, I would be flummoxed if this movie was anything less than spectacular. I think it even has the potential to be better than The Dark Knight, and I know I’m the odd man out in that belief, but it stands that in Nolan’s hands the Joker became even more unhinged and frightening than he had been thought possible of being. I am certain that this time Bane will get what he always deserved: to be feared.
My reservations in Bane as the film’s villain have long-since evaporated, but if you still worry I highly recommend you watch Tom Hardy in Bronson (trailer for which has been included at the bottom of this post). You will not be disappointed. Christopher Nolan’s Batman story has not faltered yet and contains a rare instance in which the sequel chapter may be better than the original (and if not better then certainly on par). If I watch The Dark Knight Rises and am greatly dissatisfied then I will eat my hat. If I watch The Avengers and find it is a better film than TDKR, then I will acknowledge that everyone who has been telling me that it’s the greatest Superhero film ever was right and buy you all a drink (you know who you are). But I doubt either of those things will happen. In fact, I’m sure they won’t.